You've now seen the destruction in just one area of Aleppo, its Sheikh Najjar Industrial City. And you've seen a project that increases hope and aims at a better future for Aleppo.
I have a couple of questions - some thoughts arising from seeing both the destruction and the factory-turned-school.
If the dictator and his regime - the vocabulary of the Western free press - just kill their own, how come that Aleppo wasn't destroyed much earlier? President al-Assad became president in 2000.
Until Eastern Aleppo was conquered and occupied in mid-2012, nobody seems to have had a plan to destroy the place which represented 50% of all of Syria's industrial capacity - not to speak of it being one of the most precious jewels in regional and Syrian culture and history.
What is the real story about the conversion of Aleppo the jewel to Aleppo the ghost city?
There was a series of politically dissatisfied people who at some point turned militant and put killing on their agenda. And there was an occupying force - or, rather, a lot of them. They were assisted by foreign countries - NATO, Saudi Arabia, the Golf States etc. There was a government of a sovereign state, member of the UN, that fought against them and called upon Russia to assist them from September 2015. In December 2016, that government again took control of the city.
Undoubtedly a substantial proportion of the destruction of Aleppo has been caused - as the Western narrative has it - by the Syrian government and the Russian Air Force. Undoubtedly civilians have been killed and war crimes committed.
But what is the real argument?
That the war should have been fought without civilian casualties? Or with nonviolent means à la Gandhi? If so, all sides must be blamed and not the least a particular category who is almost never blamed: the arms and ammunition dealers, those who have no goals or values except profiteering. The merchants of death.
The West's condemnation of Syria is convenient and self-serving but it is also illogical and systematically omits a few important things.
It seem that the argument that Syria does not have the right to defend itself when foreign powers occupy it - and dozens of actors fight it out among themselves on Syrian territory more or less functioning as proxies for foreign powers - most of whom are also on the ground with special forces (from Denmark to the US) or bomb Syria from the air?
And it seems to be built on the false assumption that because the leadership is authoritarian, we outsiders have a kind of God-given or exceptionalist right to do whatever we want on its territory - even supporting such groups whom we fight viciously in Europe and have hated since 9/11 2001.
Even if Bashar al-Assad is an evil man, he must be compared with other similar characters which the Western world have no qualms about supporting. And his responsibility for casualties and atrocities should be a) documented and b) compared with other similar deed - say the US-led occupation and mass killing of innocent Iraqis - before he is singled out and before we in the West make genuinely moral judgements.
• • •
Today, we don't know exactly how many civilians have been killed, wounded, forced to flee or in other ways have seen their life opportunities destroyed for a long time or forever. We do not know how many of these the Syrian government can be held accountable for. Neither do we know how many all other forces - Syrian and non-Syrian - must be accountable for.
One must ask who will at the end of the day bear what responsibility for this mad level of violence and for having let this go on for so? If we assume that the conflict started in 2011 when the violence started around some popular demonstrations - which is very doubtful if you read larger analyses and books instead of news media - then why was it allowed to continue for so long at ever higher level of militancy and slaughtering? And why did so many invest in it and support the violent struggle politically and militarily?
The combined policies and action by all sides have created the worst humanitarian crisis since 1945 anywhere in the world - according to the UN in Syria.
The only two things I think I can say that I know is that a) those who say that everything is the fault of "the other side" - that "we" bear no responsibility and that this is a rather clearcut black-and-white conflict with all the good guys on the RIOT (Rebels-Insurgents-Opposition-Terrorist) side and all the bad guys on the Syrian government, Army and Russian side will be proven utterly wrong at some point in the future.
The other is b) that we know who pays the price in Syria.
As usual, the innocent civilians - families like the one below from Eastern Aleppo that I met in the Jibrin Reception Centre - good-hearted innocent people who just wanted to go about their lives, the 98-99% of the people who have never held a weapon in their hands and never even thought of doing it.
They have lost everything.
When will the parents in that photo get a decent place to live, a job and some welfare? When will the children be able to go to school - and if they do, what will they be able to do in this city when they are 15 or 20. What will Aleppo look like and what will its situation be when they are adults and want to build a family?
Will they get that far? Will they be killed by more warfare, more intervention, revenge killings? Or will they live most of their lives as refugees somewhere?
I have seen in other war zones just how amazingly resilient people who have lost everything can actually be. Hope and life itself is the last thing they give up. I've seen people returning to their destroyed homes in former Yugoslavia and the first they did was to plant some flowers in metal pots and put them in front of the ruins.
All I feel I can do is to help bring out the story about these people - cynically cleansed away in the Western press that has instead given the Syrian Free Army, al-Qaeda, ISIS and many other terror organsations as well as the White Helmets and the Syrian National Council all the public relations they could.
The Aleppians I met gave me their trust, let me ask them questions and take their photo. The also gave me hope.
I owe it to them to tell others what I have seen.
And should someone begin to doubt, just a bit, the homogenised Western political and media narrative about Syria, it hasn't been in vain. And if someone sooner or later feel ashamed of what we all did to these innocent Syrian fellow citizens, we've taken an important step towards stopping the next war, civilisational tragedy and humanitarian catastrophe.
Conflicts are OK, societies always have them. Life without conflicts would be boring.
Violence solves no problems. They cause only more. Plus humiliation, hatred and wishes for revenge.
How many examples does humanity - all sides - need to recognize the difference between conflict and violence and that the latter only makes things worse?
And how many more humans must die before the decision-makers use their intellects, educate themselves and learn to empathise there?
In the age of mass destruction and the fall of the US Empire hashtags such as #nomorewars and #nomorealeppo are essential. We must #keepfocusonaleppo so something constructive will come out of the tragedy.
I promise that TFF and I will #keepfocusonaleppo. For as long as it may take.